Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina 2014, 16(3):20-24 | DOI: 10.26552/com.C.2014.3.20-24

Potestas Gladii in Jesus' Trial

Adrian Kacian1
1 Department of Religious Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zilina, Slovakia

The question of potestas gladii in Jesus' trial, i.e., who had the legal authority to put him to death has been for a long time one of the puzzles of the New Testament scholarship. The present article resolves the question with a balanced view that even if the ultimate potestas gladii belonged to the Roman procurator, the Jewish Sanhedrin possessed the right to condemn and execute Jesus to death on charges of the Temple offences and blasphemous utterances. However, Jesus´ activity encompassed more than just a religious threat. The Jewish representatives feared also a public tumult and uprising if they had tried to put Jesus to death by themselves. They also did not want to be publicly blamed by the masses for killing a prophet type of a person and thereby adding to their negative public reputation. Therefore they handed Jesus to Pilate even though they could execute him by themselves on the basis of blasphemy.

Keywords: Potestas gladii, Jesus' trial, Pontius Pilate, Sanhedrin

Published: July 31, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kacian, A. (2014). Potestas Gladii in Jesus' Trial. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 16(3), 20-24. doi: 10.26552/com.C.2014.3.20-24
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. VALCO, M., KRALIK, R., VALCOVA, K.: From Creation to Redemption: Chapters from Lutheran Dogmatics and Christian Ethics - Part I. (In Slovak), 2nd revised ed., KUD Apokalipsa : Ljubjlana, 2013.
    2. WHISTON, W. trans.: The Works of Josephus. Complete and Unabridged, 2nd ed., Hendrickson : Peabody, MA, 1998.
    3. ELWELL, W. A., YARBROUGH, R. W. ed.: Readings from the First-Century World. Primary Sources for the New Testament Study, Baker : Grand Rapids, 1998.
    4. SLIVKA, D.: The Torah in the Modern Jewish Tradition, Acta Univeritatis Palackianae Olomucensis, 2012, 13, 53.
    5. SORYS, S.: Rights of Freedom in the Social Teaching of the Church (in Poland), Prace naukowe Chrzanow, Wyzsa Szkola Przedsiebiorczosci i Marketingu, 2009.
    6. BROWN, R. E.: The Death of the Messiah. From Gethsemane to the Grave, vol. 1, Doubleday : New York, 1994.
    7. LIETZMANN, H.: Bemerkungen zum Prozess Jesu, Zeitschrift fur die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft, 1931, 30, 211. Go to original source...
    8. HORVATH, T.: Why was Jesus brought to Pilate, Novum Testamentum 1969, 11, 174. Go to original source...
    9. WINTER, P.: On the Trial of Jesus, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1961. Go to original source...
    10. BLINZLER, J.: Der Prozess Jesu, 4th ed., Pustet : Regensburg, 1969.
    11. BOCK, D. L.: Blasphemy and the Jewish examination of Jesus, Bulletin for Biblical Research, 2007, 17, 53. Go to original source...
    12. CATCHPOLE, D. R.: The Trial of Jesus, Brill : Leiden, 1971. Go to original source...
    13. GNILKA, J.: Jesus of Nazareth: Message and History (orig. Jesus von Nazaret, Botschaft und Geschichte,1993), Hendrickson : Peabody, MA, 1997.
    14. JEREMIAS, J.: Zur Geschichtlichkeit der Verhors Jesu vor dem Hohen Rat, Zeitschrift fur die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft, 1950-51, 43, 145. Go to original source...
    15. LAPIDE, P.: Wer War Schuld an Jesu Tod? (1987), CDK : Brno, 1997.
    16. MATERA, F. J.: The Trial of Jesus: Problems and Proposals, Interpretation, 1991, 45, 5. Go to original source...
    17. SCHUBERT, K,: Jesus im Lichte der Religionsgeschichte des Judentum, Wien : Herold Verlag, 1973.
    18. FLUSSER D.: Jesus, Jerusalem : The Hebrew University Magnes Press, 1998.
    19. DUBOVSKY, P. ed.: Mark: Commentaries to the New Testament (in Slovak), Dobra kniha : Trnava, 2013.
    20. KORECKOVA, A.: Apocryphal Tradition in the Gospel According to Mark, Testimonium Fidei, 2014, to be published.
    21. YONGE, C. D. trans.: The Works of Philo. Complete and Unabridged. New Updated Version, 4th ed., Hendrickson: Peabody, MA, 1997.
    22. GARCIA MARTINEZ, F. trans.: The Dead Sea Scrolls Translated: The Qumran Texts in English, 2nd ed., Eerdmans/E. J. Brill: Grand Rapids : Mi/ Leiden, 1996.
    23. BETZ, O.: The Temple Scroll and the Trial of Jesus, Southwestern J. of Theology 1988, 30, 5.
    24. DANBY, H. trans.: The Mishnah, Oxford University Press : London, 1933.
    25. WITHERINGTON, B. III: The Acts of the Apostles. A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary, Eerdmans : Grand Rapids, Mi, 1998.
    26. PESCH, R.: Die Apostelgeschichte I, Neukirchener : Neukirchen-Vlynn, 1986.
    27. BRUCE, F. F.: The Book of the Acts, revised ed., Eerdmans: Grand Rapids, Mi, 1988.
    28. HROBON, B.: Ethical Dimension of Cult in the Book of Isaiah, De Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 2010. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content