Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina 2017, 19(1):64-68 | DOI: 10.26552/com.C.2017.1.64-68

Ethics and Science: Challenges and Possibilities

Dalimir Hajko1
1 Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zilina, Slovakia

Perhaps the biggest challenge for the relationship of ethics and science is the issue of whether or not it is justifiable to manage human related research (for example, the question of whether we should have a moratorium on research that constitutes dangers to human being and/or humanity) socio-ethically. The author asks the question if such management is principally possible. Scientism and socio-ethical nihilism have increased their influence which manifests itself, among other things, in attempts to seclude 'a unique ethics of science' based on objective postulates of knowledge alone, separated from social praxis as well as from ethical values of humanity. Related to this situation is the fundamental question whether an ethical 'self-regulation' of science, detached from social factors that are foundational for such regulation, is at all possible. Science in and of itself does not enter into a contradiction with some abstract ethical norms: a conflict can only be induced by a specific form of its functioning in relation to concrete historic demands of morality. Another important starting point for our deliberation on this topic is the question what makes (or motivates) scientists concern themselves with moral or social problems of regulating the scientific knowledge and scientific or technological praxis? In addition to a rapid growth of scientific and technological possibilities and the ensuing serious problems of social responsibility, it is also the non-existence of such social institutions that would be able to ensure an effective and sufficiently flexible regulation of scientific research, i.e. institutions that would make it possible to diminish the gap between the interests of science and its socio-ethical consequences.

Conclusion: there is no secluded, particular ethics of knowing that would be based on an abstract concept of the objectivity of science.

Keywords: ethics; science; technology; society; responsibility

Published: January 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hajko, D. (2017). Ethics and Science: Challenges and Possibilities. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 19(1), 64-68. doi: 10.26552/com.C.2017.1.64-68
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. VALCO, M., KRALIK, R., BARRETT, L.: Moral Implications of Augustine's Philosophical and Spiritual Journey in his Confessions. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, vol. 17, No. 2, 2015, 103-108. ISSN 1335-4205. Go to original source...
    2. ETZIONI, A.: The Normativity of Human Rights is Self-Evident. Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 32, No. 1, 2010, 187-197, ISSN 0275-0392. Go to original source...
    3. JUROVÁ, J.: On Etzioni's concept of a responsive community. European J. of Science and Theology, vol. 12, No. 3, 2016, 71-80. ISSN 1841-0464.
    4. VALCO, M., VALCOVA, K.: The Epistemological Challenge of Kierkegaard's Truth is Subjectivity Principle. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, vol. 16, No. 3, 2014, 25-28. ISSN 1335-4205. Go to original source...
    5. HANES, P. and MASARIK, M.: Complementarity of Science and Theology. European J. of Science and Theology, vol. 12, No. 6, 2016, 5-20, ISSN 1841-0464.
    6. DUPKALA, R.: Recentivism of J. Banka as "practicing philosophy in harmony with the Spirit of the Age" (in Slovak). Filozofia, vol. 63, No. 2, 2008, 122-130. ISSN 0046-385X.
    7. SNOW, C. P.: The Two Cultures. London : Cambridge University Press, 1959. Go to original source...
    8. SNOW, CH. P.: The Two Cultures. A Second Look. London: Cambridge University Press, 1963.
    9. SNOW, CH. P.: Across the Great Divide. In: Nature Physics 5 / 2009, 309. Go to original source...
    10. BROCKMAN, J.: The Third Culture. Beyond the Scientific Revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995. ISBN 0-684-82344-6.
    11. BOHR, N.: Atomic Physics & Human Knowledge. London: Chapman & Hall, 1958. Go to original source...
    12. KONDRLA, P. and PAVLIKOVA, M.: From formal ethics to existential ethics. European J. of Science and Theology, vol. 12, No. 3, 2016, 101-111. ISSN 1841-0464.
    13. KRALIK, R.: Kierkegaard and his influence on Tillich's philosophy of religion. European J. of Science and Theology, vol. 11, No. 3, 2015, 183-189. ISSN 1841-0464.
    14. EINSTEIN, A.: My View of the World (in Czech). Praha: Ceskoslovensky spisovatel, 1961.
    15. LOTMAN, J. M.: The Structure of Artistic Text (in Slovak). Bratislava: Tatran, 1990. ISBN 80-222-0188-X.
    16. VALCO, M.: The Roots and Nature of Luther's Theological understanding of 'Missio Dei' in the Context of Reformation Agenda. European J. of Science and Theology, vol. 12, No. 4, 2016, 181-188. ISSN 1841-0464.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content