Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina 2018, 20(1):42-46 | DOI: 10.26552/com.C.2018.1.42-46

Comparison of The Delta Robot ABB IRB 360 Properties After Collisions

Jan Semjon1, Marek Sukop1, Marek Vagas1, Rudolf Janos1, Peter Tuleja1, Lucia Koukolova1, Peter Marcinko1, Ondrej Jurus1, Jozef Varga2
1 Department of Robotics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia
2 Prototype and Innovation Center, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Kosice, Slovakia

The use of robots with their partial damage is not common, and it is not used in safety terms. If the robot works in a controlled environment after partial damage, the robot can be used for a short period of time when the speed of moving and weight of the load are reduced. In the event of damage one of the arms of the parallel robot, the parallelism of the movable platform towards base is lost. This results in a loss of accuracy, which in the case of shortening one of the robots arms is reflected by a gradual change in the distance of the removal site from the storage site. This change is bigger with the greater distance of the center of gravity effector from the robot output flange. For the short-term unavailability of replacement arms, it was decided to continue the training with the robot with rebuilt and reinforced arm. This article concerned with performing a control measurement to detect the deviation value that could be compensated in the execution of the individual cycles of the robot. The measurement compared values of pose accuracy and pose repeatability of the robot after damage by using measured compensated deviations.

Keywords: delta robot; verification; precision; load; sensors

Published: March 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Semjon, J., Sukop, M., Vagas, M., Janos, R., Tuleja, P., Koukolova, L., ... Varga, J. (2018). Comparison of The Delta Robot ABB IRB 360 Properties After Collisions. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina20(1), 42-46. doi: 10.26552/com.C.2018.1.42-46
Download citation

References

  1. Delta Robots ABB [online]. Available: http://www.parallemic.org/Reviews/Review002.html.
  2. Delta Robots ABB [online]. Available: https://library.e.abb.com/public/31305748911b4da18b1463233d91b83a/3HAC029963-en.pdf.
  3. SHETTY, D., KOLK, R. A.: Mechatronics System Design, SI Version, 2nd edition. Global Engineering, Stanford, 2011.
  4. COP, V., DUROVSKY, F.: (2013). Advanced Mechatronic Components, Driving and Positioning Modules for Intelligent Manufacturing and Robotics Systems. Internationales Forum Mechatronik, Switzerland, 2-19, 2013.
  5. STN EN ISO 9283:2001-12. Manipulating Industrial Robots-Performance Criteria and Related Test Methods. Slovak Office of Standards, Metrology and Testing (SOSMT), Bratislava.
  6. ISO 9283:1998. Manipulating Industrial Robots-Performance Criteria and Related Test Methods. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
  7. HOCK, O., DRGONA, P., PASKALA, M.: Simulation Model of Adjustable Arm Using Denavit-Hartenberg Parameters. Proceedings of 10th international conference ELEKTRO 2014, Slovakia, CD-ROM, 176-179, 2014. Go to original source...
  8. HOCK, O., DRGONA, P., FRIVALDSKY, M., HAVRILA, R.: Simulation of Manipulator Positioning Methodology Using Inverse Kinematics. Proceedings of the 16th international scientific conference Electric power engineering (EPE 2015), Czech Republic, 706-711, 2015. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.