Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina 2018, 20(11):8-15 | DOI: 10.26552/com.C.2018.1A.8-15

Interaction of Philosophy and Natural Sciences in Byzantine Empire

Jan Zozulak1
1 Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovakia

The aim of this paper is an analysis of the interaction of philosophy and natural sciences in Byzantine Empire. The cornerstone for this will be the clarification of the function of philosophy as a metascience (μεταεπιστήμη) in Greek thought, which grappled the order of things in its functional unity of macroscopic and microscopic observation of the world. This macroscopic observation was never at odds with microscopic research but was a universal science (καθόλου ἐπιστήμη) or science about scientifically knowable phenomena (ἡ μάλιστα ἐπιστήμη τοῦ μάλιστα ἐπιστητοῦ), that is, philosophy. Despite philosophy being an activity closely linked to natural sciences, it is not a science in itself, even though it is often mistaken for such as a term. Philosophy as knowledge, or a function that leads to knowledge, is called science (ἐπιστήμη), but this does not make it equal to scientific disciplines. In the unity of all scientific disciplines, which are hierarchically ordered into a pyramid, philosophy always stands on top, it being a science about scientifically knowable phenomena. Out of all the scientific disciplines, philosophy is the one that leads to knowledge of first beginnings and causes. It is a general observation of reality, which secures the unity of scientifically knowable facts and phenomena. Philosophical knowledge as a "universal science" (καθόλου ἐπιστήμη) concentrates all partial findings into a unified whole. Philosophy is continually attempting to reach a global understanding, while science focuses on a microscopic observation of a specific part of the system.

Keywords: natural sciences; philosophy; metascience; knowledge; Byzantine Empire

Published: May 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zozulak, J. (2018). Interaction of Philosophy and Natural Sciences in Byzantine Empire. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 20(1A), 8-15. doi: 10.26552/com.C.2018.1A.8-15
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ΔΙΟΓΕΝΗΣ ΛΑΕΡΤΙΟΣ (DIOGENES LAERTIUS): Vitae philosophorum.
    2. ΒΕΙΚΟΥ, Θ.: Φιλοσοφία και επιστήμη. Αθήνα, 1980.
    3. ΤΑΤΑΚΗΣ, Β.: Φιλοσοφία και Επιστήμη. Δοκίμιο, Αθήνα: Οικ. Γ. Φέξη, 1961.
    4. ΜΑΤΣΟΥΚΑΣ, Ν.: Ιστορία της φιλοσοφίας Αρχαίας Ελληνικής, Βυζαντινής, Δυτικοευρωπαϊκής: Με σύντομη εισαγωγή στη φιλοσοφία. Θεσσαλονίκη: Π. Πουρναράς, 2010.
    5. ΜΑΤΣΟΥΚΑΣ, N.: Το περιεχόμενο της βυζαντινής φιλοσοφίας.
    6. ΤΑΤΑΚΗΣ, Β. Η ελληνική πατερική και βυζαντινή φιλοσοφία. Αθήνα: Αρμός, p. 158, 2000.
    7. HOLLWEG, A.: Theologie und Empirie. Stuttgart, p. 198 and 266, 1971.
    8. ΔΙΑΜΑΝΤΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ, Δ.: Λεξικό Βασικών Εννοιών. Αθήνα, 408-410, 1984.
    9. STORIG, H.: The Little History of Philosophy (in Czech). Zvon, Prague, 1991.
    10. ΓΚΙΚΑΣ, Σ.: Φιλοσοφία. Θρησκευτική και Ηθική Εγκυκλοπαιδεία, 11, p. 1142, Αθήναι, 1967.
    11. IERODIAKONOU, K.; ZOGRAFIDIS, G.: Early Byzantine Philosophy. GERSON, L. P. (Ed.). The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, vol. II. Cambridge University Press, p. 846, 2010.
    12. ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΗΣ. Μετά τα Φυσικά
    13. ΙΩΑΝΝΗΣ ΔΑΜΑΣΚΗΝΟΣ. Πηγή γνώσεως. PG 94, 521-1228.
    14. ΙΩΑΝΝΗΣ ΔΑΜΑΣΚΗΝΟΣ. Έκδοσις ακριβής της ορθοδόξου πίστεως. PG 94, 789-1228.
    15. ΙΩΑΝΝΗΣ ΔΑΜΑΣΚΗΝΟΣ. Διαλεκτικά ή Κεφάλαια φιλοσοφικά. PG 94, 533BC. English translation by Abraham J. Malherbe and Everett Ferguson.
    16. ΜΑΤΣΟΥΚΑΣ, Ν.: Δογματική και συμβολική θεολογία. Vol. 2. Έκθεση της ορθόδοξης πίστης σε αντιπαράθεση με τη δυτική χριστιανοσύνη. Θεσσαλονίκη, p. 29, 1999.
    17. LAMPROU, S.: East and West in the Work of Photios the Great Patriarch of Constantinople. Constantine's Letters, 9(1), p. 11, 2016. Go to original source...
    18. ΤΑΤΑΚΗΣ, Β.: Η Βυζαντινή Φιλοσοφία. Αθήνα, p. 133, 1977.
    19. ΙΩΑΝΝΙΔΗΣ, Ν.: Θεολογία καί Γραμματεία από τόν Θ΄ αιώνα καί εξής. Αθήνα: Π. Κυριακίδης, 133-137, 2009.
    20. FUCHS, F.: The Higher Schools of Constantinople in the Middle Ages (in German). Byzantinische Archiv 8, Leipzig - Berlin, p. 55, 1926.
    21. PAPAIOANNOU, S.: Michael Psellos: Rhetoric and Authorship in Byzantium. Cambridge, p. 29, 2013. Go to original source...
    22. ΝΙΚΗΦΟΡΟΣ ΒΛΕΜΜΙΔΗΣ. Επιτομή Λογικής. PG 142, 675-1004.
    23. ΝΙΚΗΦΟΡΟΣ ΒΛΕΜΜΙΔΗΣ. Επιτομή Φυσική. PG 142, 1005-1320.
    24. KANT, I.: Critique of Pure Reason (in German). Hamburg, 5-6, 1956.
    25. ΠΑΠΑΝΟΥΤΣΟΣ, Ε.: Γνωσιολογία. Αθήνα, 384-385, 1973.
    26. ΓΙΟΥΛΤΣΗΣ, Β.: Εισαγωγή στη Γενική Κοινωνιολογία. Θεσσαλονίκη, 13-21, 1981.
    27. ΤΑΤΑΚΗΣ, Β.: Απόψεις για τον προσδιορισμό της Φιλοσοφίας. In Επιστημονική Επετηρίς Φιλοσοφικής Σχολής. Vol. 9. Θεσσαλονίκη: Αριστοτέλειον Πανεπιστήμιον, 115-124, 1965.
    28. ΘΕΟΔΩΡΙΔΗΣ, Χ.: Εισαγωγή στη φιλοσοφία. Αθήνα, 14-17, 1955.
    29. ΓΙΑΝΝΑΡΑΣ, Χ.: Σχεδίασμα Εισαγωγής στη Φιλοσοφία. Αθήνα: Ίκαρος, 19-22, 2013.
    30. ΠΑΠΑΝΟΥΤΣΟΣ, Ε.: Ο λόγος και ο άνθρωπος. Αθήνα, 1971.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content