Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina 2020, 22(4):211-217 | DOI: 10.26552/com.C.2020.4.211-217

Cryptospatial Coordinate using the RPCA Based on a Point in Polygon Test for Cultural Heritage Tourism

Achmad Teguh Wibowo1, My Teguh Sulistyono2, Mochamad Hariadi3
1 Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Intelligent Electrical and Informatics Technology (ELECTICS), Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology, Surabaya, Indonesia and Faculty of Science and Technology, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
2 Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Intelligent Electrical and Informatics Technology (ELECTICS), Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology, Surabaya, Indonesia and Faculty of Computer Science, Dian Nuswantoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
3 Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Intelligent Electrical and Informatics Technology (ELECTICS), Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology, Surabaya, Indonesia

This research was aimed to enhance the cryptospatial with geospatial blockchain based on a point in polygon test. Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm (RPCA) was used for developing a blockchain. The steps taken include: (1) Data from the surveyors were entered using application connected to the transaction set; (2) The transaction set sent data to the transaction proposal; (3) The transaction proposal will distribute to every connected validating of nodes for executing the smart contract with the point in a polygon test method; (4) If the process succeeded with the maximum fault tolerance of 20%, then the node records a new chain to the ledger. This method is faster than Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) blockchain for approximately 26% to add a new chain in the ledger and for 52% to decrypt the blockchain with a mobile device. The result of this process is a cryptospatial coordinate for the cultural heritage tourism.

Keywords: cryptospatial coordinate, cultural heritage tourism, RPCA, point in polygon test

Received: December 13, 2019; Accepted: May 13, 2020; Published: October 1, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Wibowo, A.T., Sulistyono, M.T., & Hariadi, M. (2020). Cryptospatial Coordinate using the RPCA Based on a Point in Polygon Test for Cultural Heritage Tourism. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina22(4), 211-217. doi: 10.26552/com.C.2020.4.211-217
Download citation

References

  1. DOGRU, T., MODY, M., LEONARDI, C. Blockchain technology and its implications for the hospitality industry. Boston Hospitality Review. 2018, winter, p. 1-12. ISSN 2326-0351.
  2. HEBERT, C., DI CERBO, F. Secure blockchain in the enterprise: a methodology. Pervasive and Mobile Computing [online]. 2019, 59, p. 101038. ISSN 1574-1192. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2019.101038 Go to original source...
  3. NAKAMOTO, S. Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system [online]. 2008. Available from: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
  4. AL-JAROODI, J., MOHAMED, N. Blockchain in industries: a survey. IEEE Access [online]. 2019, 7, p. 36500-36515. eISSN 2169-3536. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2903554 Go to original source...
  5. ONDER, I., TREIBLMAIER, H. Blockchain and tourism: three research propositions. Annals of Tourism Research [online]. 2018, 72, p. 180-182. ISSN 0160-7383. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2018.03.005 Go to original source...
  6. GRETZEL, U., SIGALA, M., XIANG, Z., KOO, C. Smart tourism: foundations and developments. Electronic Markets [online]. 2015, 25(3), p. 179-188. ISSN 1019-6781, eISSN 1422-8890. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0194-x Go to original source...
  7. PURVES, R. S., CLOUGH, P., JONES, C. B., HALL, M. H., MURDOCK, V. Geographic information retrieval: progress and challenges in spatial search of text. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval [online]. 2018, 12(2-3), p. 164-318, 2018. ISSN 1554-0669, eISSN 1554-0677. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1500000034 Go to original source...
  8. KAMEL BOULOS, M. N., WILSON, J. T., CLAUSON, K. A. Geospatial blockchain: promises, challenges, and scenarios in health and healthcare. International Journal of Health Geographics [online]. 2018, 17(1), p. 1-10. ISSN 1476-072X. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-018-0144-x Go to original source...
  9. Data on monthly foreign tourist visits in 2019 - Ministry of Tourism Republic of Indonesia [online] [accessed 2019-09-10]. 2019. Available from: http://www.kemenpar.go.id/post/data-kunjungan-wisatawan-mancanegara-bulanan-tahun-2019
  10. PUTRA, D. W. Identification of the sustainability of the old town area through the protection of cultural heritage buildings by the surabaya city government. Jurnal Pengembangan Kota. 2016, 4(2), p. 139. ISSN 2337-7062, eISSN 2503-0361. Go to original source...
  11. SCHWARTZ, D., YOUNGS, N., BRITTO, A. Analysis of the XRP ledger consensus protocol [online] [accessed 2019-10-26]. Cornell University, 2018. Available from: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.07242
  12. KHATUN, F., SHARMA, P. Arbitrary polygon query handling algorithm on GIS based on three value logic - an approach. International Journal of Computer Applications [online]. 2016, 144(1), p. 32-35. ISSN 0975-8887. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016910090 Go to original source...
  13. KUMAR, G. N., BANGI, M. An extension to winding number and point-in-polygon algorithm. IFAC-Papers On Line [online]. 2018, 51(1), p. 548-553. ISSN 2405-8963. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.05.092 Go to original source...
  14. CORP, F. FOAM map [online] [accessed 2019-08-17]. 2019. Available from: https://foam.space/
  15. Google maps platform documentation - Google. Inc [online] [accessed 2019-07-20]. Available from: https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/
  16. ZHANG, S., LEE, J.-H. Analysis of the main consensus protocols of blockchain. ICT Express [online]. 2019, 2, p. 1-5. ISSN 2405-9595. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2019.08.001 Go to original source...
  17. SCHAEFER, M. The graph crossing number and its variants: a survey. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics [online]. 2018, 1, p. 1-113. ISSN 1077-8926. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37236/2713 Go to original source...
  18. SUNDAY, D. Inclusion of point in a polygon [online]. 2011. Available from: http://geomalgorithms.com/a03-_inclusion.html
  19. HAO, J., SUN, J., CHEN, Y., CAI, Q., TAN, L. Optimal reliable point-in-polygon test and differential coding boolean operations on polygons. Symmetry [online]. 2018, 10(10), p. 1-26. eISSN 2073-8994. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10100477 Go to original source...
  20. PERLES, M. A., MARTINI, H., KUPITZ, Y. S. A Jordan-Brouwer separation theorem for polyhedral pseudomanifolds. Discrete and Computational Geometry [online]. 2009, 42(2), p. 277-304. ISSN 0179-5376, eISSN 1432-0444. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-009-9192-0 Go to original source...
  21. ROSS, F., ROSS, W. T. The Jordan curve theorem is non-trivial. Journal of Mathematics and the Arts [online]. 2011, 5(4), p. 213-219. ISSN 1751-3472, eISSN 1751-3480. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17513472.2011.634320 Go to original source...
  22. BERSHADSKIY, S., VILLA, C. React native cookbook take your react native application development to the next level with this large collection of recipes. 1. ed. Birmingham: Packt, 2016. ISBN 978-1-78646-255-8.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.