Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina 2025, 27(2):F1-F12 | DOI: 10.26552/com.C.2025.019

Impact of Fog Levels on Free-Flow Speeds in Mixed Traffic Conditions

Angshuman Pandit ORCID...*, Anuj Kishor Budhkar ORCID...
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah, India

The effect of fog levels on drivers' free-flow speeds for various vehicles in mixed traffic conditions is examined in this research. Visibility and free-flow speeds from eight highways are simultaneously collected and analyzed. The findings show distinct driver behavior patterns under different fog conditions. In dense fog, small visibility improvements lead to linear speed increases, while in light fog, speeds are mostly unchanged, though drivers maintain higher speeds than in clear conditions. Regardless of a vehicle type, driving patterns in fog are similar, though specific speeds differ. Cars tend to drive dangerously fast, while trucks remain slower due to limited manoeuvrability. This study offers insights for operational strategies in dense fog, supporting the use of dynamic warning systems and variable speed limits to reduce unsafe speed variations and potential crashes in low visibility.

Keywords: visibility, free-flow speed, drivers' behaviour, mixed traffic
Grants and funding:

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Conflicts of interest:

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Received: September 30, 2024; Accepted: January 16, 2025; Prepublished online: February 14, 2025; Published: April 1, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pandit, A., & Budhkar, A.K. (2025). Impact of Fog Levels on Free-Flow Speeds in Mixed Traffic Conditions. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 27(2), F1-12. doi: 10.26552/com.C.2025.019
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Federal Highway Administration. Highway statistics 2004. USA: Federal Highway Administration, 2006.
    2. CAVALLO, V. Perceptual distortions when driving in fog. In: Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies ICTTS: proceedings [online]. 2002. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1061/40630(255)135 Go to original source...
    3. EDWARDS, J. B. Speed adjustment of motorway commuter traffic to inclement weather. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour [online]. 1999, 2(1), p. 1-14. ISSN 1369-8478, eISSN 1873-5517. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8478(99)00003-0 Go to original source...
    4. PENG, Y., ABDEL-ATY, M., LEE, J., ZOU, Y. Analysis of the impact of fog-related reduced visibility on traffic parameters. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems [online]. 2018, 144(2), 04017077. ISSN 2473-2907, eISSN 2473-2893. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.0000094 Go to original source...
    5. TU, H., LI, Z., LI, H., ZHANG, K., SUN, L. Driving simulator fidelity and emergency driving behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board [online]. 2015, 2518(1), p. 113-121. ISSN 0361-1981, eISSN 2169-4052. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3141/2518-15 Go to original source...
    6. AL-GHAMDI, A. S. Experimental evaluation of fog warning system. Accident Analysis and Prevention [online]. 2007, 39(6), p. 1065-1072. ISSN 0001-4575, eISSN 1879-2057. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.05.007 Go to original source...
    7. PRETTO, P., VIDAL, M., CHATZIASTROS, A. Why fog increases the perceived speed. In: Driving Simulation Conference DSC 2008: proceedings. 2008.
    8. SNOWDEN, R. J., STIMPSON, N., RUDDLE, R. A. Speed perception fogs up as visibility drops. Nature [online]. 1998, 392, 450. ISSN 0028-0836, eISSN 1476-4687. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/33049 Go to original source...
    9. HOOGENDOORN, R. G., HOOGENDOORN, S. P., BROOKHUIS, K. A., DAAMEN, W. Adaptation longitudinal driving behavior, mental workload, and psycho-spacing models in fog. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board [online]. 2011, 2249(1), p. 20-28. ISSN 0361-1981, eISSN 2169-4052. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3141/2249-04 Go to original source...
    10. HOOGENDOORN, R. G. Empirical research and modelling of longitudinal driving behavior under adverse conditions [online]. Doctoral thesis. Delft, Netherlands: TRAIL Research School, 2012. Available from: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:1e0117ef-d0db-4d00-bce6-203d75a30ddc
    11. PEI, Y., CHENG, G. Research on the relationship between discrete character of speed and traffic accident and speed management of freeway. China Journal of Highway and Transport. 2004, 17(1), p. 74-78. ISSN 1001-7372.
    12. Stopping Sight Distance - Federal Highway Administration FHWA [online]. 2022. Available from: https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/geometric/pubs/mitigationstrategies/chapter3/3_stopdistance.cfm
    13. MCCANN, K., FONTAINE, M. D. Assessing driver speed choice in fog with the use of visibility data from road weather information systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board [online]. 2016, 2551(1), p. 90-99. ISSN 0361-1981, eISSN 2169-4052. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3141/2551-11 Go to original source...
    14. KOCMOND, W. C., PERCHONOK, K. Highway fog. NCHRP Report 95. Washington, D. C.: Transportation Research Board, 1970.
    15. EDWARDS, J. B. Motorway speeds in wet weather: the comparative influence of porous and conventional asphalt surfacings. Journal of Transport Geography [online]. 2002, 10(4), p. 303-311. ISSN 0966-6923, eISSN 1873-1236. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00044-3 Go to original source...
    16. TRICK, L. M., TOXOPEUS, R., WILSON, D. The effects of visibility conditions, traffic density, and navigational challenge on speed compensation and driving performance in older adults. Accident Analysis and Prevention [online]. 2010, 42(6), p. 1661-1671. ISSN 0001-4575, eISSN 1879-2057. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.005 Go to original source...
    17. YAN, X., LI, X., LIU, Y., ZHAO, J. Effects of foggy conditions on drivers' speed control behaviors at different risk levels. Safety Science [online]. 2014, 68, p. 275-287. ISSN 0925-7535, eISSN 1879-1042. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.013 Go to original source...
    18. BOER, E. R., CARO, S., CAVALLO, V. A Cybernetic perspective on car following in fog. In: Driving Assessment Conference 4 2007: proceedings [online]. 2007. p. 452-458. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1275 Go to original source...
    19. BROUGHTON, K. L. M., SWITZER, F., SCOTT, D. Car following decisions under three visibility conditions and two speeds tested with a driving simulator. Accident Analysis and Prevention [online]. 2007, 39(1), p. 106-116. ISSN 0001-4575, eISSN 1879-2057. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.06.009 Go to original source...
    20. CARO, S., CAVALLO, V., MARENDAZ, C., BOER, E. R., VIENNE, F. Can headway reduction in fog be explained by impaired perception of relative motion? Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society [online]. 2009, 51(3), p. 378-392. ISSN 0018-7208, eISSN 1547-8181. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720809339621 Go to original source...
    21. SAFFARIAN, M., HAPPEE, R., DE WINTER, J. C. F. Why do drivers maintain short headways in fog? A driving-simulator study evaluating feeling of risk and lateral control during automated and manual car following. Ergonomics [online]. 2012, 55(9), p. 971-985. ISSN 1366-5847. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.691993 Go to original source...
    22. WHITE, M. E., JEFFERY, D. J. Some aspects of motorway traffic behaviour in fog. Berkshire: Highway Traffic Division, 1980. ISSN 0305-1293.
    23. LIANG, W. L., KYTE, M., KITCHENER, F., SHANNON, P. Effect of environmental factors on driver speed. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board [online]. 1998, 1635(1), p. 155-161. ISSN 0361-1981, eISSN 2169-4052. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3141/1635-21 Go to original source...
    24. MUELLER, A. S., TRICK, L. M. Driving in fog: the effects of driving experience and visibility on speed compensation and hazard avoidance. Accident Analysis and Prevention [online]. 2012, 48, p. 472-479. ISSN 0001-4575, eISSN 1879-2057. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.03.003 Go to original source...
    25. ROSEY, F., AILLERIE, I., ESPIE, S., VIENNE, F. Driver behaviour in fog is not only a question of degraded visibility - a simulator study. Safety Science [online]. 2017, 95, p. 50-61. ISSN 0925-7535, eISSN 1879-1042. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.02.004 Go to original source...
    26. GAO, K., TU, H., SUN, L., SZE, N. N., SONG, Z., SHI, H. Impacts of reduced visibility under hazy weather condition on collision risk and car-following behavior: implications for traffic control and management. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation [online]. 2020, 14(8), p. 635-642. ISSN 1556-8318. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2019.1597226 Go to original source...
    27. DENG, C., WU, CH., CAO, S., LYU, N. Modeling the effect of limited sight distance through fog on car-following performance using QN-ACTR cognitive architecture. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour [online]. 2019, 65, p. 643-654. ISSN 1369-8478, eISSN 1873-5517. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.12.017 Go to original source...
    28. PENG, Y., ABDEL-ATY, M., SHI, Q., YU, R. Assessing the impact of reduced visibility on traffic crash risk using microscopic data and surrogate safety measures. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies [online]. 2017, 74, p. 295-305. ISSN 0968-090X, eISSN 1879-2359. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.11.022 Go to original source...
    29. HAMILTON, B., TEFFT, B., ARNOLD, L., GRABOWSKI, J. Hidden highways: fog and traffic crashes on America's roads (technical report). Washington, D. C.: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, 2014.
    30. YANNIS, G., KONDYLI, A., MITZALIS, N. Effect of lighting on frequency and severity of road accidents. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport [online]. 2013, 166(5), p. 271-281. ISSN 0965-092X, eISSN 1751-7710. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1680/tran.11.00047 Go to original source...
    31. WU, Y., ABDEL-ATY, M., LEE, J. Crash risk analysis during fog conditions using real-time traffic data. Accident Analysis and Prevention [online]. 2018, 114, p. 4-11. ISSN 0001-4575, eISSN 1879-2057. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.05.004 Go to original source...
    32. D'ADDARIO, P. M. Perception-response time to emergency roadway hazards and the effect of cognitive distraction. Thesis. Toronto: University of Toronto, 2014
    33. KIM, Y.-K., KIM, H., SEO, J.-W., AN, H.-Y., CHOI, Y.-H. Meteorological analysis of the sea fog in winter season on Gyeonggi Bay, Yellow Sea: a case study for the 106-vehicle pileup on February 11, 2015. Journal of Coastal Research [online]. 2017, 79(sp1), p. 124-128. ISSN 0749-0208. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2112/SI79-026.1 Go to original source...
    34. LYNN, C., SCHREINER, CH., CAMPBELL, R. Reducing fog-related crashes on the Afton and Fancy Gap Mountain Sections of I-64 and I-77 in Virginia. Final contract report. Charlottesville, Virginia: Virginia Transportation Research Council, 2002.
    35. CHENG, G. Research on the method of setting speed limits on freeway and urban expressway. China: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2007.
    36. CHOI, S., OH, C. Proactive strategy for variable speed limit operations on freeways under foggy weather conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board [online]. 2016, 2551(1), p. 29-36. ISSN 0361-1981, eISSN 2169-4052. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3141/2551-04 Go to original source...
    37. LI, X., YAN, X., WONG, S. C. Effects of fog, driver experience and gender on driving behavior on S-curved road segments. Accident Analysis and Prevention [online]. 2015, 77, p. 91-104. ISSN 0001-4575, eISSN 1879-2057. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.01.022 Go to original source...
    38. Indian highway capacity manual Indo-HCM. New Delhi: Central Road Research Institute, 2017.
    39. JOCHER, G., CHAURASIA, A., QIU, J. YOLO by Ultralytics Version 8.0.0. Computer software [online]. 2023. Available from: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics
    40. TAO, J., WANG, H., ZHANG, X., LI, X., YANG, H. An object detection system based on YOLO in traffic scene. In: 2017 6th International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology ICCSNT: proceedings [online]. IEEE. 2017. eISBN 978-1-5386-0493-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSNT.2017.8343709 Go to original source...
    41. FUNG, G. S. K., YUNG, N. H. CH., PANG, G. K. H. Camera calibration from road lane markings. Optical Engineering [online]. 2003, 42(10). eISSN 1560-2303. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1606458 Go to original source...
    42. DUMONT, E., CAVALLO, V. Extended photometric model of fog effects on road vision. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board [online]. 2004, 1862(1), p. 77-81. ISSN 0361-1981, eISSN 2169-4052. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3141/1862 Go to original source...
    43. OVSENIK, L., TURAN, J., MISENCIK, P., BITO, J., CSURGAI-HORVATH, L. Fog density measuring system. Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica [online]. 2013, 12(2), p. 67-71. ISSN 1335-8243, eISSN 1338-3957. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10198-012-0021-7 Go to original source...
    44. HAUTIERE, N., AUBERT, D., DUMONT, E. Mobilized and mobilizable visibility distances for road visibility in fog. In: 26th Session of the CIE: proceedings. 2007.
    45. ROUSSEEUW, P. J. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics [online]. 1987, 20, p. 53-65. ISSN 0377-0427, eISSN 1879-1778. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 Go to original source...
    46. GAO, K., TU, H., SHI, H. Stage-specific impacts of hazy weather on car following. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport [online]. 2019, 172(6), p. 347-359. ISSN 0965-092X, eISSN 1751-7710. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.16.00182 Go to original source...
    47. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. A policy on geometric design of highways and streets: the green book. 7. ed. Washington, D. C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2018. ISBN 978-1-56051-676-7.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content