Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina 2010, 12(1):31-37 | DOI: 10.26552/com.C.2010.1.31-37

Better Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Proportion

Ivana Pobocikova1
1 Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zilina, Slovakia

Interval estimation of a binomial proportion is one of the basic problems in statistics. In technical practice a binomial proportion is often used in statistical quality control. The standard Wald interval and the exact Clopper-Pearson interval are the most common and frequently used intervals. They are presented in the majority of statistical literature. It is known that the Wald interval performs poorly and this interval should not be used. In this paper we recommend the alternatives of confidence intervals that have a better performance and are appropriate for practical use. We compare the performance of six alternatives of confidence intervals for a binomial proportion: the Wald interval, the Clopper-Pearson interval, the Wilson score interval, the Wilson score interval with continuity correction, the Agresti-Coull interval and the Jeffreys interval in terms of the coverage probability, the interval length and the root mean square error.

Keywords: binomial distribution, binomial proportion, confidence interval, coverage probability, interval length, root mean square error

Published: March 31, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pobocikova, I. (2010). Better Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Proportion. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 12(1), 31-37. doi: 10.26552/com.C.2010.1.31-37
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AGRESTI, A., COULL, D. A.: Approximate is Better than "Exact" for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportion. American Statistician 52, p. 119-126, 1998 Go to original source...
    2. BLYTH, C. R., STILL, H. A.: Binomial Confidence Intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association 78, pp. 108-116, 1983 Go to original source...
    3. BROWN, D. L., CAI, T. T., DASGUPTA, A.: Interval Estimation for a Binomial Proportion. Statistical Science 16, pp. 101-133, 2001 Go to original source...
    4. CLOPPER, C. AND PEARSON, S.: The use of Confidence or Fiducial Limits Illustrated in the Case of the Binomial. Biometrika 26, pp. 404-413, 1934. Go to original source...
    5. FENG, X.: Confidence Intervals for Proportions with Focus on the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Master thesis, Simon Fraser University, 2006.
    6. LAPLACE, P. S.: Theorie Analytique des Probabilities. Paris, France, Courier, 1812
    7. NEWCOMBE, R. G.: Two-sided Confidence Intervals for the Single Proportion; Comparison of Several Methods. Statistics in Medicine 17, pp. 857-872, 1998 Go to original source...
    8. PIRES, M. A., AMADO, C.: Interval Estimators for a Binomial Proportion: Comparison of Twenty Methods. REVSTAT - Statistical Journal, Volume 6, Number 2, p. 165-197, 2008
    9. POBOČÍKOVÁ, I.: Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Proportion. Proc. 8th International Conference APLIMAT, Bratislava, February 3.-6., pp. 791-800, 2009
    10. REICZIGEL, J.: Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Proportion: Some New Considerations. Statistics in Medicine 22, pp. 611-621, 2003 Go to original source...
    11. VOLLSET, S. E.: Confidence Intervals for a Binomial Proportion. Statistics in Medicine 12, pp. 809-824, 1993 Go to original source...
    12. WILSON, E. B.: Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 22, pp. 209-212, 1927 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content